i. Expected Quality

The Nursing Journal of India (NJI) offers a solid platform for the timely publication of high-quality research. NJI follows a transparent peer-review process, and authors are required to participate fully in this process to ensure the integrity and quality of the publication. Authors are strongly advised against using copy-and-paste tactics when writing articles. Submissions should be original, showcasing novelty in both ideas and content, with the aim of engaging the target audience and contributing valuable insights for further research. The credibility and reliability of the content are essential for maintaining strong publication ethics. Articles must adhere to the journal's formatting standards, ensuring clarity and comprehensive presentation of the research and authors' profiles. Proper citations and referencing of sources, including individual articles, authors, and publications, are expected.

ii. Novelty and Plagiarism

Authors are expected to submit entirely original work and properly cite or reference any content or ideas borrowed from other sources. Each author is responsible for ensuring compliance with ethical standards and publication policies to prevent any form of misconduct. Authors must confirm that their manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere, and is not under consideration for publication in any other journal. They should be open to accepting feedback and making necessary revisions based on the suggestions provided by peer reviewers. Furthermore, if any errors or mistakes are identified after publication, authors must promptly inform the editor and take appropriate steps to correct or retract the affected content.

iii. Exposure Benchmarks

Authors are expected to submit entirely original work and properly cite or reference any content or ideas borrowed from other sources. Each author is responsible for ensuring compliance with ethical standards and publication policies to prevent any form of misconduct. Authors must confirm that their manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere, and is not under consideration for publication in any other journal. They should be open to accepting feedback and making necessary revisions based on the suggestions provided by peer reviewers. Furthermore, if any errors or mistakes are identified after publication, authors must promptly inform the editor and take appropriate steps to correct or retract the affected content.

iv. Data Access and Retention

Authors are expected to submit original research articles for peer review and agree to make their work publicly accessible. They should also be prepared to retain the data supporting their research for a reasonable period after publication, ensuring transparency and accountability.

v. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

Authors are ethically advised against submitting the same content to multiple platforms for publication. Simultaneous submissions or concurrent reviews of the same paper are considered unprofessional and are strictly prohibited. A paper that has already been published in a national or international journal should not be resubmitted to another journal, as this constitutes a violation of the principle of novelty.

vi. Acknowledgement of Sources

Authors must acknowledge and cite all sources accessed and used during the course of their study. If the content of another research work has influenced the reported findings, it should be properly referenced. Additionally, any information obtained through training, confidential services, or third-party discussions should only be used with explicit written permission from the original source, ensuring proper authorization before including such data in the publication.

vi. Acknowledgement of Sources

Authors must acknowledge and cite all sources accessed and used during the course of their study. If the content of another research work has influenced the reported findings, it should be properly referenced. Additionally, any information obtained through training, confidential services, or third-party discussions should only be used with explicit written permission from the original source, ensuring proper authorization before including such data in the publication.

vii. Authority of Paper

The names of authors and co-authors should be clearly stated in the research article, with proper acknowledgment given to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. Contributors, agencies, and institutions that supported the research or played a substantive role in the project should be recognized in the acknowledgments section. Authorship should be limited to those who have had a meaningful involvement in the study. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to its submission for publication.

viii. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the research involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment with inherent hazards, authors must clearly identify these risks in the manuscript. When the study involves animal or human subjects, authors are required to include a statement confirming that all procedures were conducted in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines, and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) have approved the research. Additionally, authors should specify that informed consent was obtained for any experimentation involving human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be safeguarded and respected throughout the research process.

ix. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors must disclose any financial or other substantial conflicts of interest in their manuscript that could be perceived to influence the results or interpretation of their work. This includes fully disclosing all sources of financial support for the research project. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include employment, consultancy arrangements, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications or registrations, and grants or other funding. Authors should provide this information at the earliest possible stage to ensure transparency and uphold the integrity of the research.

x. Fundamental Errors in Published Works

If an author identifies a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their responsibility to promptly inform the journal editor or publisher and work with them to correct or retract the paper. Similarly, if the editor or publisher is made aware by a third party of a substantial error in a published paper, the author must act swiftly to either retract or correct the paper, or provide evidence to the editor that supports the accuracy of the original work.